Zack!
Damn those folks at Fox Sports. Them and their "exclusive broadcast rights". Here I sit, enjoying another Cubs rout, which should be finished off in plenty of time for the debut of Zack Greinke in just over an hour. Despite the $230 or so I shelled out for MLB Extra Innings as well as mlb.tv, I have will not be able to see the game. Bastards.
As I wrote in my fantasy correspondence (post v.0414), I think it would be wise to temper our expections of Greinke. There will be an adjustment period. He may be lights out for a start or two, a la Rick Harden, until a book is established on him. Then he will probably takes some lumps. Overall, I think he'll be right around the league ERA this season. It's next season where I think the Royals will reap the benefits of bringing Greinke up now. And because of that I think the Royals are doing the right thing in calling him up, even if this season is lost.
Is this season really lost? Well, I'm on record as saying so, as I wrote in the latest Stat Guy (right here). But even though I know this intellectually, I still harbor hope for a miracle. The Royals have already won two games on this road swing, I expected zero or one. If they can steal one today or tomorrow, that's a .500 trip and a record of 14-27.
So what if Greinke provides a spark as the Royals enter the soft part of their schedule, a 19-game stretch, and the bullpen, anchored by Jeremy Affedlt, suddenly becomes airtight? What if they win 16 of 19 and sit at .500 in the middle of June? In my head, I know this won't happen. But hope is a funny thing. We cling to it to the last. I know I do and will continue for a while yet.
As for Affeldt: Without getting into to it in detail, I'm glad the Royals moved Affeldt to the bullpen. In general, I am against this. Starting pitchers are too valuable and you don't want to limit the innings of one of your best pitchers if he has the ability to throw 200 or more effectively. Yes, closers have value just not as much as the average fan and the mainsteam media thinks. And the ones who have the most value are a very select bunch - Mariano, Gagne, et al.
In Affeldt's case, however, he just hasn't been the same pitcher in a starting role, for whatever reason. And he has enough starts under his belt at this point to draw some conclusions. His dominance as a reliever last season suggest that Affledt could join that select group of dominant closers. If he does, the Royals will have a valuable weapon and a suddenly valuable trading chip.
Anderson keeps the pace
Unlike his last start, when he waited till the seventh inning to get bombed, Brian Anderson wasted no time in getting clubbed last night, giving up six runs in three innings. Thus, he keeps pace in his quest to surrender the most runs in modern big-league history:
RUNS YEAR R
1 Brian Anderson 2004 233*
2 Snake Wiltse 1902 226
3 Bill Carrick 1900 224
4 Joe McGinnity 1901 219
5 Chick Fraser 1901 210
6 Pete Dowling 1901 209
T7 Bobo Newsom 1938 205
T7 Togie Pittinger 1903 205
9 Pink Hawley 1900 204
10 Bill Carrick 1901 198
* projected total through May 21
Northern League season is here!
I don't plan in going into it too much in this forum, but the Northern League is part of my beat for .
The Star. This week, I wrote my 2004 Northern League preview, the best part of which is a reference to the Watson's girl. By the way, the team capsules were arranged into 'Western' and 'Eastern' divisions. This is not correct - the league realigned into a North-South arrangement this season. It wasn't my error and I wasn't in that night to catch it. The T-Bones have drawn over 5,000 fans for both of their games so far. I've been asked whether I think the Royals bad start hurts or helps the T-Bones. I really don't think it has any effect at all. The T-Bones have really carved out a nice little niche for themselves. They play in a league that is well-run and the franchise should be on solid footing for a long time.